Pulse Microsystems Community
The platform that enables you to build rich, interactive communities
Do you know that in the past, art had to be hand drawn stitch by stitch before it could be "punched" ?

I think there are not many digitizers left that learned to punch (yes, it really means punching... holes in a card) the hard way.

Before you could even start to punch, you needed to hand draw an amplification of your design. This was very tedious work. Not only you had to use a projector to amplify your design 6 times it's original size, you also had to draw and indicate each single stitch into your drawing. This work was extremely time consuming as you can imagine. In many cases, the artist was a different person than the puncher. The artist however had to know a thing or two about embroidery back then.

He used tools like compass, various types of rulers and hand held wheels with spiky points to *** little holes into the paper. That was needed to be able to determine densities for satin and fill stitches.

Below you can see a couple of images showing an example of a typical enlarged drawing, a portion of it for the fill area and also a picture showing some of the spiky handhel wheels.

Ah, not to forget, in those days prices per 1000 stitches were around US$ 50.- to US$ 60.-


Posted 10 Mar 2010 12:00 AM by Pulse_Roland
Filed under: , , ,

Comments

henningdesign wrote re: Do you know that in the past, art had to be hand drawn stitch by stitch before it could be "punched" ?
on 11 Mar 2010 3:17 AM

I began as an artist drawing the logos to be digitized 4x larger than the final design on posterboard. In the late 80's I began digitizing. I remember running out our logos on paper tape and even being able to read and splice a tape without any problem. We modern digitizers are so spoiled these days! I love using a mouse instead of a four button puck on a board.

Pulse_Roland wrote re: Do you know that in the past, art had to be hand drawn stitch by stitch before it could be "punched" ?
on 11 Mar 2010 10:47 AM

Yes, I can imagine that you could even detect on the tape whether you were looking at Satin Stitches or Fills or Running stitches. It was a challenge all the time and multihead embroidery was something more or less "exotic". At least you had the luxury from the beginning of the 80's onwards to be able to digitize in segment portions rather than stitch by stitch. That was a huge step forward.

hetnan wrote re: Do you know that in the past, art had to be hand drawn stitch by stitch before it could be "punched" ?
on 7 Jun 2010 2:58 PM

Ah yes I remember those days well.  I still think for fine detail working on a board can't be beat!

sistemas wrote re: Do you know that in the past, art had to be hand drawn stitch by stitch before it could be "punched" ?
on 29 Aug 2010 4:00 PM

Meu Deus. Isso tem pelo menos 15 anos que não via mais.

Esse foio um tempo "romantico". Realmente os punchadores tinham que con hecer profundamente o bordado.

O hoje com os softwares , parace video game.

Mas foi uma epoca muito boa.

Copyright 2009 Pulse Microsystems Ltd.
Powered by Community Server (Non-Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems